I can barely say epistemology and when I think of pragmatic idealism,
my head starts spinning round and round like a whirling dervish. So, this
little narrative is an attempt to talk about epistemology and pragmatic
idealism in terms that farmer Fred might
understand; thank you in advance for your patience with me.
How do you and I know
what we know? Excuse me, how do we know what we know sounds like some sort of
riddle or trick question to me. In our discussion Wednesday in class, we went
through a whole mess of explanations and descriptions of how we might know what
we know. I think we listed about five or six different items that all lend
themselves to knowing what we know, the least of which (in my mind) was not intuition.
But wait just a gal darned minute, my Unity friends have been teaching me to
use my intuition since I first walked into a Unity church over 30 years ago. I
was also told in Unity I could determine my own spiritual truth and not have to
adopt some other person’s or religion’s truth. It seems to me then, that
intuition may well be the most important aspect of epistemology. That is, if
you took away intuition and you left the remainder of the “ other “ factors like Authority, Revelation, Scientific
method, and Tradition, we’d have one
heck of a boring religion. It would all be about somebody else’s or some
Traditional understanding of religious truth; now is that what you want? Of
course, Authority can be applied to one’s own understanding, i.e. one’s
(intuitive) understanding of truth principles. When we understand truth
principles, we can then speak with Authority (for ourselves).
I don’t know about you, but I was sold on Unity because I
could take what was written in the Bible and I could take spiritual
truths and interpret them myself. I could literally do as it states in the
third step of 12 step recovery, “find a God as I understood Him or Her,” not
your God or your understandings, but mine, and one that works for me and that I am
comfortable with. Well sir, maybe I’m missing something here, but when it comes
to the EP word, I’m voting for Intuition. Okay, I’m out here on this tightrope
all by myself, and I might well fall off, but then that’s the chance you have
to take in the big leagues, and when I left traditional Christianity and turned
myself into a Unitich, I voted for intuition. It may not be much, but it’s all
I got.
Now, with regard to Pragmatic Idealism, now isn’t that one
beautiful phraseology. Is pragmatic idealism
a reference to the 4th amendment to the U S Constitution? I have a
difficult time in my mind linking pragmatism with idealism. To me it’s like
linking John Boehner to the Democratic Party. That dog
just won’t hunt. To be honest, pragmatic idealism as a reflection of the Unity
Movement might be better phrased as Idyllic idealism. Why don’t we just “fess
up” and tell the truth. Unity is an idyllic alliteration of a band of Unitichs
who call themselves “truth seekers”. To
suggest that there’s anything practical or pragmatic about Unity is like saying
that George W was a genius, and he never told a falsehood. Call me weird or
even radical, but I’m Ok that Unity is made up of idealistic hippies, who
couldn’t balance our checkbooks even with a slide rule. The world needs us
Unitichs to balance all of them “right wing” traditionalists who seem to have
an answer for everything. Thank God for Unity. And thank God for Balance. (I
just wish I had some.)
I like your cut to the chase attitude and sense of humor. Regarding the first part of your post you fail to mention the significant role experience plays in theological reflection. For me this is a factor almost, if not, as important as intuitive reflection. I don't think an experience is boring if we are fully awake to it. I think you allude to experience but don't call it by name. I think there is a palatable Unity experience in many of the Unity churches or centers that I have attended.
ReplyDeleteRegarding the part on pragmatic idealism and your seemingly deep skepticism that there is anything practical and pragmatic about Unity is surprising. I guess I am skeptical of the depth of your skepticism. I would like to hear more.
John--Thanks for the down-home spin. Intuition is one of the sources of knowing, but what happens when someone's intuition tells him/her that John Boehner and George W are standing for all that is good, true, and right in America, and his wife has an intuition which substitutes President Obama and Harry Reid for the aforementioned politicos? Intuition unchecked can get people into trouble because it is effectively beyond criticism. Certainly, inspiration is an engine of spiritual growth, but somebody laid the tracks and leveled the hilltops before that train left the station. We bring so much embedded theology and clutural conditioning to the intuitive process that other factors are needed to coiunterbalance. But things of the heart--intuition--can also counterbalance coldly rationalistic thought. The sacred intellect needs the feeling nature. I would argue that without both the spirit cannot fly high as it was intended to go.
ReplyDelete